[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VC mode and git
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: VC mode and git |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:22:03 +0900 |
Stefan Monnier writes:
> That would try to pretend that we still live in the CVS days, but these
> days are gone.
Richard, and quite probably other long-time contributors, still does
live in the CVS days in an important sense.
> The new normal is to commit and push separately
True, but not relevant to Emacs, which intends to support users, not
norms.
Perhaps rather than assuming a universal meaning for DWIM, C-x v v
could implement a limited concept of "workflow". Eg, a workflow could
be modeled by a list ((LEXP1 OP1) (LEXP2 OP2) ...), and the workflow
would be implemented something like
(catch 'done
(mapc (lambda (kv)
(let ((lexp (first kv))
(op (second kv)))
(if (eval lexp) (throw (funcall op)))))))
A couple of default workflows could be provided.
- Re: VC mode and git, (continued)
- Re: VC mode and git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/03/28
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/28
- Re: VC mode and git, Richard Stallman, 2015/03/29
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/29
- Re: VC mode and git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/03/29
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/29
- Re: VC mode and git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/03/29
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/29
- Re: VC mode and git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/03/29
Re: VC mode and git, Stefan Monnier, 2015/03/24
- Re: VC mode and git,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
Re: VC mode and git, Richard Stallman, 2015/03/26
Re: VC mode and git, Stefan Monnier, 2015/03/26
Re: VC mode and git, Steinar Bang, 2015/03/25
Re: VC mode and git, Mark H Weaver, 2015/03/26