[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: UI inconveniences with M-.

From: Dmitry Gutov
Subject: Re: UI inconveniences with M-.
Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 21:29:40 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0

On 05/02/2015 10:59 AM, Helmut Eller wrote:

Theoretically this can already be done by ignoring xref-location-group
or by specializing xref-location-group for xref-etags-location so that it
returns always the same group.

Or, if we try to be extra-informative, group by find-tag-tag-order functions (maybe replacing each name with some words in human language; or classify them into several groups, too). But we won't have any place to write file names to.

Thinking about it: for etags it would make sense to group xrefs by name
of the TAGS file because etags--xref-find-definitions doesn't sort xrefs
"globally"; xrefs are reordered only within a TAGS file.

Indeed. But when combined with the above, it will be 2-3 levels of grouping.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]