[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tooltips GC overhead
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Tooltips GC overhead |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Aug 2015 03:31:52 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> The problem is that it would slow down functions like `cons'.
> I don't see why it has to.
I don't see how it wouldn't have to ;-)
> And we could do that only when the memory profiler is invoked.
AFAICT it would require an extra test somewhere in Fcons, and that
test will always have to be performed.
> In any case, it's much better than the current useless profile.
I'm not convinced it'd make it sufficiently better to justify the cost.
I'd be OK with adding this "more precise allocation profiler" as
a compile-time option, so we could at least see if the improved
precision does make it more useful.
Stefan
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, martin rudalics, 2015/08/01
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Stefan Monnier, 2015/08/03
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/08/03
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Stefan Monnier, 2015/08/03
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/08/03
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/08/04
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Stefan Monnier, 2015/08/07
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/08/07
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Stefan Monnier, 2015/08/07
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/08/07
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Stefan Monnier, 2015/08/07
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/08/08
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, David Kastrup, 2015/08/08
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Paul Eggert, 2015/08/07
- Re: Tooltips GC overhead, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/08/07