[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el
From: |
Stephen Leake |
Subject: |
Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Aug 2015 02:02:08 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (windows-nt) |
João Távora <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 08/01/2015 05:20 PM, Stephen Leake wrote:
>>
>> The best bet seems to be to store them in the project file, which a project
>> backend reads and saves to the project instance's slots.
>
> I'd prefer that .dir-locals is used if you can manage it. I don't want to
> have to debug other sources of variable settings other than the ones
> I have to know now. It also makes backend writing much easier.
Well, you learned about .dir-locals at some point. If a standard Emacs
project file had been available then, you might have learned that
instead :).
But since .dir-locals exists, it would make sense to have a project
implementation that uses .dir-local information as much as possible.
--
-- Stephe
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, (continued)
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, João Távora, 2015/08/10
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/08/10
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, João Távora, 2015/08/10
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/08/10
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, João Távora, 2015/08/10
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/08/10
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/08/10
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Stefan Monnier, 2015/08/07
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/08/07
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Stefan Monnier, 2015/08/07
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el,
Stephen Leake <=