Re: behaviour change in cl-subseq

[Leo Liu]

On 2015-08-06 17:34 +0800, Phillip Lord wrote:
> Fortunately, Tassilo has answered this; I've never used CL.

I answered it in a hurry before going to work :(

> I agree that this change is entirely justifiable. I'm generally not a
> huge fan of silently ignoring inaccurate arguments. If you are happy
> with the changed interface, then I have no major problem, although it
> may break packages besides mine.

The old behaviour was odd and inconsistent (try it on []).

> Do you mind if I patch the docstrings, though?

Not at all.

Leo