Re: behaviour change in cl-subseq

[Phillip Lord]

Nicolas Petton <address@hidden> writes:

> Phillip Lord <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Was working through this, and found this behaviour.
>>
>> ;; error
>> (seq-subseq '() 10 10)
>>
>> ;; nil
>> (seq-subseq '() -10 -10)
>>
>> So, a bounding box error when the index is too large, but it is silently
>> ignored when too low.
>>
>> Not convinced this makes sense.
>
> Indeed, it doesn't.  Do you want to push a patch for it?


Yes, will do. My expectation is this:

;; error
(seq-subseq '() 10 10)

;; (same) error
(seq-subseq '() -10 -10)


You agree?

Phil