[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
Subject: |
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric? |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Sep 2015 17:10:17 +0100 |
> Since it is possible to search for only 'á', it would be nice to have
> some convenient way to search only for 'a' with no accents.
>
> The only convenient interface I can think of is that you type, in a
> postfix input method, a ' DEL. Currently that is equivalent to typing
> just a. But we could conceivably make it different.
>
> Can someone think of some other interface for this?
You can toggle off char folding with M-s '. That's the same number of keys as this idea where you would type an accent and then delete.
Of course, one affects the entire search string, while the other would only affect that specific letter.
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, (continued)
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/07
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/03
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/09/03
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/03
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/03
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/03
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?,
Artur Malabarba <=
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Pip Cet, 2015/09/03
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Davis Herring, 2015/09/01
RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/09/01