[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric? |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Sep 2015 17:33:59 +0300 |
> From: Jean-Christophe Helary <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 12:08:17 +0900
>
> > On Sep 3, 2015, at 11:41, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Jean-Christophe Helary <address@hidden>
> >> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 06:51:07 +0900
> >>
> >> the default it to catch *exactly* what the user types.
> >
> > That goes against long-standing Emacs practice, and I envision strong
> > objections.
>
> Even if the current behavior were to be emulated by appropriate variables?
You mean, customization variables? We were talking about the
_default_ behavior. It's that default that I think people will object
to have changed towards case-sensitivity.
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, (continued)
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/02
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2015/09/02
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Artur Malabarba, 2015/09/03
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/03
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Nix, 2015/09/07
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/07
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Nix, 2015/09/07
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/07
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/09/03
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/03
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/03
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/03
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Artur Malabarba, 2015/09/02
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Pip Cet, 2015/09/03
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Davis Herring, 2015/09/01