[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric? |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Sep 2015 18:47:17 +0300 |
> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 07:36:51 +0200
> Cc: Drew Adams <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> From: Ulrich Mueller <address@hidden>
>
> >>>>> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> >> No. You are asking for that only when you use a search pattern
> >> that does not use the diacriticals. When you search with á in
> >> the pattern you are NOT asking for matches that disregard the
> >> diacriticals. And why not?
>
> > Because á does include a diacritical. By specifying it, the user
> > told us the diacriticals are important, and shouldn't be
> > disregarded.
>
> I disagree. When I search for "Müller" I want it to also match
> "Muller"
Then you should type "Muller" instead of "Müller".
> (I'd also like it to match "Mueller" but that's a different issue.)
With this feature, you can.
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, (continued)
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/12
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/11
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/12
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/12
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/08
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Juri Linkov, 2015/09/08
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/09
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/08
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Juri Linkov, 2015/09/08
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/08
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Artur Malabarba, 2015/09/09
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/09
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/09
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/09
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/09
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/09
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, David Kastrup, 2015/09/10