[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The SHA1 sunset
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: The SHA1 sunset |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Jan 2016 17:42:41 +0200 |
> From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 01:53:56 +0100
>
> John Wiegley <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >>> We might consider at some point in the future to move this check to the
> >>> "medium" (default) setting.
> >
> >> Why not now?
> >
> > Let's move it to the medium setting now. The writing has been on the
> > wall for SHA1 for a little while now.
>
> It has, but warning users about something that isn't a thing yet is
> doing the users a disservice.
My understanding is that it's already a thing, but I'm not an expert
on those issues.
- The SHA1 sunset, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/01/03
- Re: The SHA1 sunset, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/03
- Re: The SHA1 sunset, John Wiegley, 2016/01/03
- Re: The SHA1 sunset, Mike Gerwitz, 2016/01/03
- Re: The SHA1 sunset, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/01/04
- Re: The SHA1 sunset, Mike Gerwitz, 2016/01/05
- Re: The SHA1 sunset, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/01/05
- Re: The SHA1 sunset,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: The SHA1 sunset, James Cloos, 2016/01/04