[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tags-loop-continue
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: tags-loop-continue |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:08:39 +0200 |
> From: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:14:14 +0300
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> > I didn't talk about tags-search, I'm talking only about
> > tags-loop-continue.
>
> Because tags-query-replace uses a special keymap, we can bind
> tags-loop-continue to M-, in it. _Maybe_ we can similarly use a new
> keymap during tags-search's execution.
>
> If you think it's a good idea, I can look into it.
I think it should be okay, thanks. As long as the command is
interactive, it can always be rebound, if users so want.
> On the flip side, the users may get confused that M-, is bound to
> different commands in different contexts.
But the current binding of M-, makes no sense while tags-search is
on-going, I think. So it sounds like a good compromise to me.
- Re: tags-loop-continue, (continued)
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/10
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/10
- RE: tags-loop-continue, Drew Adams, 2016/01/10
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/10
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eric Abrahamsen, 2016/01/11
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/10
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/10
- Re: tags-loop-continue,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/10
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/10
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/13
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/14
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/14
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/14
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/14
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/14
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/14
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/14