Re: tags-loop-continue

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Cc: address@hidden
> From: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 21:19:27 +0300
> 
> >> On the flip side, the users may get confused that M-, is bound to
> >> different commands in different contexts.
> >
> > But the current binding of M-, makes no sense while tags-search is
> > on-going, I think.  So it sounds like a good compromise to me.
> 
> I suppose. My main concern is that someone can get used to M-, being 
> bound to tags-loop-continue, and then use this key combination outside 
> of tags-search, to an entirely different result.

Could be, but I think it's a lower probability than someone using it
as part of tags-search.  So doing this is progress, I think.

Thanks.