|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: xref and displaying locations in appropriate window or frame |
Date: | Wed, 27 Jan 2016 04:00:24 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:44.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/44.0 |
On 01/26/2016 01:05 PM, martin rudalics wrote:
Back to where we were: ‘pop-to-buffer’ is based on the <= 2 windows per frame paradigm.
Why <= 2? Are you saying I should use some different function, after applying the dedicated status and switch to the window O?
I thought pop-to-buffer is basically the default choice for displaying a buffer when you're not sure which window to use.
> Let's say that the lines in X are about half of the frame's width. At > least, that's my usual experience. The default frame's width?
Of a maximized frame's width. Which is 229 here.
>> Then we're back at the initial problem that by default Emacs never shows >> more than two windows on a frame :-( > > I suppose so. But its resolution should be orthogonal to what I do. Sometimes you want the cake and eat it.
Everybody does.
Ahh, funny. I never switch back to *Compilation* manually. I always keep it open until I have resolved all issues. And my grep sidebars hardly occupy any space. I often show two or more greps or searches simultaneously. And whenever I remove a grep sidebar from the frame, its buffer gets killed automatically. I wouldn't remember anyway what I needed it for.
I do, sometimes. And maybe the user has their own special subroutine which knows which buffer to show and why.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |