Re: Should we restore manually maintained ChangeLogs

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 23:58:07 -0800
> 
> >> My own experience is otherwise. For the kinds of development I do, I 
> >> rarely see ChangeLog screwups now, whereas I used to see them routinely.
> >
> > With or without git-merge-changelog?
> 
> Without.

Then I understand why your experience is so negative.

> > Please describe the details of your proposal.
> 
> For the more-traditional approach, apply the attached patch to emacs-25, and 
> merge it to master.  Other branches can pick it up as needed.

Didn't we consider this approach, and decided that having ChangeLog.2
was better?