Re: Should we restore manually maintained ChangeLogs

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 10:16:29 -0800
> 
> On 03/09/2016 08:04 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> >> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> >> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 23:58:07 -0800
> >>
> >>>> My own experience is otherwise. For the kinds of development I do, I 
> >>>> rarely see ChangeLog screwups now, whereas I used to see them routinely.
> >>> With or without git-merge-changelog?
> >> Without.
> > Then I understand why your experience is so negative.
> 
> This appears to be implying that if I had installed git-merge-changelog 
> and configured Git to use it, I would have had a better experience. I 
> don't see how this would be so. As I said, I rarely do merges, so making 
> merges work better wouldn't help me.

If you don't do merges, you won't ever see merge conflicts.