|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: Should we restore manually maintained ChangeLogs |
Date: | Wed, 9 Mar 2016 20:49:40 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 |
On 03/09/2016 08:39 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
Making vc-git-expanded-log-entry look for and show a corresponding entry from the fixes file shouldn't be particularly hard.But what about vc-print-log and vc-region-history?
vc-print-log - only if we make it use the same format as vc-print-root-log, which isn't not a terrible solution (it'll improve UI consistency).
vc-region-history - probably not, if we can't use the same approach for messages as above. Although we could hack something with jit-lock...
Doable in Elisp, yes, but how hard, and at what performance cost?
With the above caveats, not too hard, and shouldn't be too slow either.Although if we could co-opt git notes after all, it would be even easier to just ask Git to show them together with commit messages. But that's something Someone should investigate.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |