[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 09 Mar 2016 23:06:01 +0200 |
> From: Kaushal Modi <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 15:56:03 -0500
>
> Is there a clean way to prevent the building of emacs ctags binary and man
> pages attogether? May be a
> configure option?
Why not put your Exuberant ctags elsewhere, and use a shell alias to
invoke it?
- Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Kaushal Modi, 2016/03/09
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Paul Eggert, 2016/03/09
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/10
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Ulrich Mueller, 2016/03/10
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Kaushal Modi, 2016/03/10
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/03/10
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/10
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Ulrich Mueller, 2016/03/10
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/10