Eli Zaretskii <
address@hidden> schrieb am So., 6. März 2016 um 21:05 Uhr:
> From: Philipp Stephani <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2016 19:16:37 +0000
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> This is probably for practical purposes (no point in showing thousands of "CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-xyz"
> completions). For a character escape these considerations don't apply, and it would be very surprising and
> confusing to not accept all characters.
The only characters that ucs-names omits are CJK ideographs, whose
codepoints can be computed from the name algorithmically. All the
others are non-characters, right? So why it won't be a good idea to
simply use ucs-names?
I've attached another patch to switch to ucs-names.
0004-Use-ucs-names.patch