Re: Why does the tutorial talk about C-n/C-p etc?

[Clément Pit--Claudel]

On 03/14/2016 08:16 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> 
> The idea of the tutorial is to get people started.  Then they should
> go to the Emacs manual to learn more.  We describe a lot of
> possibly-cool features in the Emacs manual, but there's no need
> to teach them in the tutorial.

Hi Richard,

The manual is indeed great. The question is, what drives people to read it?
Maybe the tutorial is a good occasion to teach people about the manual: we show 
people a cool feature, and we point them to the relevant section in the manual.

The issue that I'm pointing out is that migrating to Emacs has a small cost, at 
least at the beginning. It would be wonderful if we could tell people "do you 
think Emacs is too (bloated|complicated|hard-to-learn|...) for you? Just check 
the 5-minutes tutorial and see for yourself".

But again, maybe there should be two documents: the Emacs elevator pitch, and 
the Emacs tutorial.

Clément.

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature