[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concurrency, again
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Concurrency, again |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:32:11 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> > Out of curiosity I've implemented Plan9/Go-style CSP based on
>>> > libtask (without OS threads) in Emacs with minimal changes, and
>>> > most things seem to work just fine.
>>> Great. Have you then tried to make Gnus use it?
PS> No, I don't use Gnus myself, so I couldn't compare it to the current state
PS> anyway.
[...]
> This might be a good performance test for any proposed concurrent changes.
I was thinking of another kind of performance test: how much time is
necessary to take existing code and make it use the concurrency support.
Stefan
- Re: Concurrency, again, (continued)
- Re: Concurrency, again, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/10/26
- Re: Concurrency, again, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/26
- Re: Concurrency, again, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, Philipp Stephani, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, Stefan Monnier, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, Philipp Stephani, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/10/26
- Re: Concurrency, again,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Concurrency, again, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/10/26
- Re: Concurrency, again, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/25
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, raman, 2016/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Søren Pilgård, 2016/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Philipp Stephani, 2016/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/09