[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concurrency, again
|
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
|
Subject: |
Re: Concurrency, again |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:39:17 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:32:11 -0400 Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
SM> I was thinking of another kind of performance test: how much time is
SM> necessary to take existing code and make it use the concurrency support.
Include emacs-devel debates and it easily triples ;)
Ted
- Re: Concurrency, again, (continued)
- Re: Concurrency, again, Daniel Colascione, 2016/10/27
- Re: Concurrency, again, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/28
- Re: Concurrency, again, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/10/26
- Re: Concurrency, again, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/26
- Re: Concurrency, again, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, Philipp Stephani, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, Stefan Monnier, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, Philipp Stephani, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/10/26
- Re: Concurrency, again, Stefan Monnier, 2016/10/26
- Re: Concurrency, again,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: Concurrency, again, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/25
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, raman, 2016/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Søren Pilgård, 2016/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Philipp Stephani, 2016/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/09