[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Preview: portable dumper
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Preview: portable dumper |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Dec 2016 04:18:04 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> I do not think the portable dumper is something that's so complex as to
> not be worth the performance, especially since any lread implementation
> that's even close to being acceptably fast is going to be very complex
> in its own right.
Rather than arguing theoretically about speculations,
let's see people do their best to improve the big-elc-file
approach, and then compare facts with facts.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- RE: Preview: portable dumper, (continued)
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Joost Kremers, 2016/12/03
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/03
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/03
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Paul Eggert, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Daniel Colascione, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Ken Raeburn, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Paul Eggert, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/02
Re: Preview: portable dumper,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Preview: portable dumper, David Requena Zabala, 2016/12/01