[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Preview: portable dumper
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Preview: portable dumper |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Dec 2016 04:18:03 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
I sympathize with your general point, but I don't think it is
conceivable to make Emacs's C code much simpler or easier to maintain
than it is now.
Also, I don't think the portable dumper would increase the conplexity,
not if it is written cleanly.
To increase the _number_ of modules that look at Lisp objects with a
given level of complexity does not increase the complexity. When
changing the data structures, it is no harder to update 4 places than
3 places. It adds a little more work, but it isn't _harder_ work.
I conclude that the portable dumper won't make it any harder to
find people to work on the C code.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Daniel Colascione, 2016/12/01
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Paul Eggert, 2016/12/01
- Re: Preview: portable dumper,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/01
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/01
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, John Wiegley, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, John Wiegley, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Karl Fogel, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Daniel Colascione, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Karl Fogel, 2016/12/02