[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Preview: portable dumper
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Preview: portable dumper |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Dec 2016 19:26:27 +0200 |
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 01:16:17 -0800
>
> Emacs never worked on that platform
>
> Sure it did. Emacs worked until FreeBSD 11, when the arm64 port modernized
> its memory-management implementation.
>From https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=24892#104
Ed Maste wrote:
> arm64 support was first available in a release in FreeBSD 11.0, without
sbrk, and sbrk never existed on the stable/11 branch.
Thanks, I didn't know that. So Emacs has never worked in this environment.
Doesn't that mean Emacs on arm64 was never available before FreeBSD
11, and sbrk never existed on FreeBSD/arm64?
> they removed a certain library function, which happens to be called by
> unexec.
>
> This was no accident. They removed it because it was producing bogus values,
> and it didn't reflect how FreeBSD actually allocates memory.
And they are thinking on bringing it back, see
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=24892#92
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Daniel Colascione, 2016/12/01
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Paul Eggert, 2016/12/01
- Re: Preview: portable dumper,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/01
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/01
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/01
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, John Wiegley, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, John Wiegley, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Karl Fogel, 2016/12/02