Re: Preview: portable dumper

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 04.12.2016 14:20, Alan Mackenzie wrote:

> This discussion was long and (to
> me) unexpectedly aggressive, and didn't concern itself with the
> correctness of the patch.

It really did. When a patch disregards a whole class of current use 
cases, and is likely to make them worse, that's very much a correctness 
issue.

> It seemed intended to prevent the adoption of
> my patch by spreading FUD.  If this was indeed the intention, it was
> entirely successful.

Thanks for the insult, Alan.