[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Dec 2016 19:09:46 +0200 |
> From: Nikolaus Rath <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 08:45:15 -0800
>
> >> > I'm still wondering how useful this could be for C code though. There are
> >> > many coding conventions where the opening { of a function does not go in
> >> > the left-most column. As far as I understand, such coding conventions
> >> > would
> >> > lead to slower parsing?
> >>
> >> This convention is not useful for C.
> >
> > Our coding standards clearly call for starting a function's body with
> > an opening brace in column zero.
>
> I would hope that Emacs is used not only to edit its own source code but
> also other code, for which these standards don't apply.
It is, but how is that relevant to the issue at hand? The issue at
hand is how does open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start affect C code
editing. The intent of my reference to GNU standards was to point
out that having an opening brace in column zero is a very frequent
situation in the C sources of any GNU project, and therefore saying
this convention is not useful for C flies in the face of the reality
right under our feet.
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, (continued)
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Andreas Röhler, 2016/12/24
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/27
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/28
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/28
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Nikolaus Rath, 2016/12/28
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Nikolaus Rath, 2016/12/28
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/28
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Nikolaus Rath, 2016/12/29
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/29
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/29
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Andreas Röhler, 2016/12/30
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/28
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/28
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/28
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/24