[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] unsafep: Add support for (funcall)

From: Vibhav Pant
Subject: Re: [PATCH] unsafep: Add support for (funcall)
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 21:10:32 +0530

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:26 AM, Stefan Monnier
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Hmm... I don't quite get it:
>     (funcall '<sym> ...)
> is better written as
>     (<sym> ...)
> so why/when do you see such code?  Could we rewrite it before unsafep
> gets to look at it.

Indeed, byte-compile-funcall rewrites such forms. I've just added this to remove
a potential false positive from unsafep, as it's not only the byte compiler and
optimizer that use it (for instance, ses.el uses it to warn the user
about "unsafe"

Vibhav Pant

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]