[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Continuous integration
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Continuous integration |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:41:05 +0200 |
> From: Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:14:58 -0400
>
> Absolutely. I think the benefits reach beyond that--especially if a pull
> request workflow could be set up. Right now it's "push into branch; ask
> for comments" which is delightfully retro.
Actually, it's more like "obtain write access, then push your changes
directly".
- Re: Continuous integration, (continued)
- Re: Continuous integration,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Continuous integration, Toon Claes, 2017/03/22
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/22
- Re: Continuous integration, raman, 2017/03/22
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/23
- Re: Continuous integration, T.V Raman, 2017/03/23
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/23
- Re: Continuous integration, Toon Claes, 2017/03/23
- Re: Continuous integration, Chad Brown, 2017/03/23
- Re: Continuous integration, Yuri Khan, 2017/03/24
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/24