[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?

From: Marcin Borkowski
Subject: Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?
Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 06:00:23 +0200
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 26.0.50

On 2017-05-27, at 09:49, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:

>> From: Marcin Borkowski <address@hidden>
>> Cc: Jean-Christophe Helary <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>> Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 06:08:24 +0200
>> On 2017-05-23, at 04:55, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > Just replace it with 2 different spellings dispatched by the number.
>> I guess you are aware that 2 different spellings are not enough for
>> certain languages...?
> I guess you are unaware that I'm the team leader for one of the TR
> translation teams? ;-)

I was.  Now I'm not. ;-)

But I wasn't ironical.  I really thought you were aware of that.

>> (I do not want to discourage work on it.  But I'm afraid it's more
>> difficult than many people think...
> This complexity is already accounted for in gettext, AFAIK.

OK, I'll take a look (out of sheer curiosity).


Marcin Borkowski

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]