[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 06e452a 1/3: Allow Edebug's instrumentation to

From: Alan Mackenzie
Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 06e452a 1/3: Allow Edebug's instrumentation to be used for other purposes
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 20:02:12 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)

Hello, Stefan.

On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 00:13:24 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > address@hidden edebug-after-instrumentation-functions
> > +An abnormal hook run by Edebug after it instruments a form.
> > +Each function is called with one argument, a form which has
> > +just been instrumented by Edebug.

> This seems a bit awkward.

Why?  How is it at all awkward?

> How 'bout something like the 100% untested patch below?

You don't say why you want to make the patch.  It looks to me like you
want to replace a normal abnormal hook with a single function.  This is
less flexible (unless one jumps through hoops).  It is also
incompatible; it will break applications which use the existing

Why do you want to break these applications?  What benefits will the
new single function scheme bring?

I'm against this incompatible change (which I don't fully understand).

>         Stefan

[ .... ]

Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]