Re: Current State of CEDET in Emacs tree and standalone

[Joshua Branson]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
>   >   I'm under the
>   > impression that semantic may not be needed, since microsoft is pushing
>   > the LSP (language server protocal).
>
> We don't have a GNU language server; what we do have is CEDET.
> So we should continue maintaining CEDET.

Do you mean that we don't have a GCC-powered language server?  Or that
we don't have a freedom respecting powered language server?  Honestly,
my knowledge of LSP is near zero.

Thanks,

Joshua