[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: open-{gnutls,network}-stream backwards compatibility

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: open-{gnutls,network}-stream backwards compatibility
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 20:30:22 +0200

> From: Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 18:12:22 +0000
> On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 18:47:55 +0100 Robert Pluim <address@hidden> wrote: 
> RP> So nil/t would mean :nowait nil/t, and anything else would be a
> RP> plist. Itʼs not perfect, but I guess backwards compatibility is
> RP> important.
> I like that approach as well, noting also that the `open-gnutls-stream' docs 
> say
>   This is a very simple wrapper around `gnutls-negotiate'
> which in turn takes a plist. So maybe the callers should just call
> `gnutls-negotiate', and `open-gnutls-stream' should be deprecated
> because it has failed to be a simple wrapper :)

If we can make the change backward-compatible, there's no reason to
deprecate it.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]