Re: Comprehensive JSX support in Emacs

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 15.02.2019 11:21, Jackson Ray Hamilton wrote:
> However, considering JavaScript has a well-respected specification, it 
> seems a bit risky to me to enable non-standard syntax extensions in 
> “.js” buffers without some precautions.  The standards body could define 
> new syntax in the base language that invalidates userland syntax 
> extensions, or other syntax extensions with competing semantics could 
> become popular.  JSX itself is a successor to E4X, with which it 
> overlaps partially.

I think it's a very important point.