[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why do we have xsignal?
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why do we have xsignal? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 22 Apr 2019 12:02:23 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 |
On 4/22/19 10:30 AM, Philipp Stephani wrote:
> xsignal is exactly the same as Fsignal, is there any reason we need to keep
> it?
The two names are present only for historical reasons; see Bug#24047. I
don't see any reason to keep xsignal other than inertia, and would favor
dropping xsignal and changing its callers to use Fsignal as this will
simplify the code.