[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why fido, icycles, ido, icomplete
From: |
Filipp Gunbin |
Subject: |
Re: Why fido, icycles, ido, icomplete |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Nov 2019 20:54:00 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (darwin) |
On 06/11/2019 22:03 +0000, João Távora wrote:
> Ergus <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> 1) Do we really need another confusing mode (fido-mode)? instead of
>> improve one of the already existing alternatives with just an option to
>> use flex?
>
> I'm sorry you find the name confusing. I find it appealing (it's "fake
> ido"), but we can change it (Stefan proposed icomplete-ido-mode).
+1 for the name change, because Fido was a pre-Internet-era BBS network
popular at least in Russia. I was too young when it was operational,
but even for me the name would be confusing.
Filipp
- Re: Why fido, icycles, ido, icomplete, (continued)
- Re: Why fido, icycles, ido, icomplete, Stefan Monnier, 2019/11/07
- Re: Why fido, icycles, ido, icomplete, Óscar Fuentes, 2019/11/07
- Re: Why fido, icycles, ido, icomplete, Stefan Monnier, 2019/11/07
- Re: Why fido, icycles, ido, icomplete, Óscar Fuentes, 2019/11/07
- Re: Why fido, icycles, ido, icomplete, Stefan Monnier, 2019/11/07
- Re: Why fido, icycles, ido, icomplete, João Távora, 2019/11/07
- Re: Why fido, icycles, ido, icomplete, João Távora, 2019/11/06
- Re: Why fido, icycles, ido, icomplete, Ergus, 2019/11/06
- Re: Why fido, icycles, ido, icomplete, João Távora, 2019/11/07
- Re: Why fido, icycles, ido, icomplete, Ergus, 2019/11/07
Re: Why fido, icycles, ido, icomplete,
Filipp Gunbin <=
- Re: Why fido, icycles, ido, icomplete, Óscar Fuentes, 2019/11/08
- Re: Why fido, icycles, ido, icomplete, Nicolas Semrau, 2019/11/08
- Re: Why fido, icycles, ido, icomplete, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/08
- Re: Why fido, icycles, ido, icomplete, Juanma Barranquero, 2019/11/08
- Re: Why fido, icycles, ido, icomplete, João Távora, 2019/11/08
- Re: Why fido, icycles, ido, icomplete, Ergus, 2019/11/08