[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal to change naming format to allow package-prefix/function-na
|
From: |
Teemu Likonen |
|
Subject: |
Re: Proposal to change naming format to allow package-prefix/function-name |
|
Date: |
Tue, 31 Dec 2019 16:48:53 +0200 |
Clemens Radermacher [2019-12-31T13:06:16+01] wrote:
> Maybe using a char suffix would be better so it would better align
> with current conventions and make it easier to search/complete for
> users which expect those:
>
> package-name-/function-name
> package-name--/private-fun-name
Not sure if this is a good idea but here is yet another possibility: use
a capital letter in package name words and small letter in others:
Package-Name-command-name
Package-Name--private-name
--
/// OpenPGP key: 4E1055DC84E9DFF613D78557719D69D324539450
// https://keys.openpgp.org/search?q=address@hidden
/ https://keybase.io/tlikonen https://github.com/tlikonen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature