Re: Emacs's set-frame-size can not work well with gnome-shell?

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 21.01.2020 19:11, martin rudalics wrote:
> Without a timer-based delay?

Usually without (but sometimes with). If a completion popup blinks in 
and out of existence with a 100ms timeout, it's bound to cause 
irritation (if not more, for those affected by certain neurological 
disorders).

> OK.  So I conclude that the Lucid build is 
> currently fully functional
> for you without having to cycle visibility.

Indeed.

As you can see from the discussion I linked several times now, I 
recommended using it as the workaround. Unfortunately, it's much slower 
for some other users. But it's really working very fast for me. I don't 
understand this.