[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Renaming some functions
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Renaming some functions |
Date: |
Sun, 03 May 2020 23:15:57 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Here's my first concrete renaming proposition:
> multibyte-string-p => string-multibyte-p
> Any objection?
The actual behavior of the function is to return t if the argument is
a multibyte string, nil for any other type. The clear name for that
is multibyte-string-p.
string-multibyte-p implies a function that accepts only strings as arguments
and returns t if the argument is multibyte.
ISTR that I thought about this when I defined that function, to choose
which of those two names to give it.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Re: Renaming some functions,
Richard Stallman <=