[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] [WIP] Port feature/native-comp to Windows.
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] [WIP] Port feature/native-comp to Windows. |
Date: |
Sat, 09 May 2020 19:33:49 +0300 |
> From: Andrea Corallo <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 16:27:18 +0000
> Cc: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
>
> Nicolas Bértolo <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > PS: I don't understand why the freloc table is necessary. Is it impossible
> > to
> > rely on the dynamic linker to solve that when calling dlopen()?
>
> The problem is that being Emacs an executable we do not export the
> symbols to be used by the dynamic linker.
You mean, the symbols of primitives that compiled Elisp code calls?
> I think it should be possible (depending on the tool-chain) but I never
> tried. What I'm not sure of is how much is it portable given is not a
> common scenario. Because typically afterwards the answer comes up to be
> "not enough" at the time I decided to handle it inside, the generated
> code should be similar.
But that is even less portable, isn't it? Or am I missing something?
Re: [PATCH] [WIP] Port feature/native-comp to Windows., Andrea Corallo, 2020/05/09
Re: [PATCH] [WIP] Port feature/native-comp to Windows., Andrea Corallo, 2020/05/09
Re: [PATCH] [WIP] Port feature/native-comp to Windows.,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: [PATCH] [WIP] Port feature/native-comp to Windows., Andrea Corallo, 2020/05/09
Re: [PATCH] [WIP] Port feature/native-comp to Windows., Andrea Corallo, 2020/05/09