[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PL support
From: |
Clément Pit-Claudel |
Subject: |
Re: PL support |
Date: |
Sun, 10 May 2020 00:08:55 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 |
On 09/05/2020 19.19, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
> On 10.05.2020 01:23, Clément Pit-Claudel wrote:
>> On 09/05/2020 17.49, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
>>> On 09.05.2020 22:55, Clément Pit-Claudel wrote:
>>>> Let's not be too hasty with calling the debate silly. I don't use either
>>>> lsp-mode or eglot but I do see strong opinions in favor of both, and
>>>> "blessing" one as official, especially a (currently) less popular one, can
>>>> cause sour feelings and give the perception that emacs-devel is being
>>>> insular.
>>> In principle, I disagree: as long as Eglot is maintained and works well,
>>> we*should* present it as "blessed", and we can do that in introduction
>>> videos, documentation, tutorials, etc.
>> But why more than lsp-mode?
>
> Because they choose to participate in the "core" Emacs development very
> little?
Oh? I thought we chose to exclude them by writing a competing package instead
of trying to bring them aboard.
What does it mean for an external package to participate in the core Emacs
development?
> And because they chose not to get included in GNU ELPA, which would be a
> "reward" in itself (oob availability for new users). We couldn't mention
> packages not in GNU ELPA in documentation as prominently anyway.
Really? The only thing I could find is
https://github.com/emacs-lsp/lsp-mode/issues/83, where the general opinion is
that it would be good for lsp-mode to be in core, until they (mistakenly) seem
to conclude that eglot is in core already. What am I missing?
> We couldn't mention packages not in GNU ELPA in documentation as prominently
> anyway.
Why? Is the policy that it's bad to endorse code not *owned* by the FSF?
- Re: PL support, (continued)
- Re: PL support, João Távora, 2020/05/09
- Re: PL support, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/09
- Re: PL support, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/05/09
- Re: PL support, João Távora, 2020/05/09
- Re: PL support, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/09
- Re: PL support, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/05/09
- Re: PL support, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/09
- Re: PL support,
Clément Pit-Claudel <=
- Re: PL support, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/10
- Re: PL support, João Távora, 2020/05/10
- Re: PL support, Stefan Monnier, 2020/05/10
- Re: PL support, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/10
- Re: PL support, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/10
- Re: PL support, 조성빈, 2020/05/10
- Re: PL support, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/05/11
- Re: PL support, Stefan Kangas, 2020/05/11
- Re: PL support, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/05/11
- Re: PL support, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/11