[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PL support
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
Re: PL support |
Date: |
Thu, 14 May 2020 02:31:33 +0100 |
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 1:29 PM <address@hidden> wrote:
> > That’s not exaggeration. That’s the current status quo. MELPA is ubiquitous.
> > It’s not optional if you want a not-shit Emacs environment [...]
> Please stop this hostility. My Emacs environment is "not-shit" without any
> of MELPA. Your world isn't necessarily other people's world (and vice-versa).
I agree. Some of this discussion is based on the presumption that
popularity somehow equals quality, much like Reddit likes to equate
it with truth.
João
- Re: PL support, (continued)
- Re: PL support, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/14
- Re: PL support, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/11
- Re: PL support, Stefan Monnier, 2020/05/11
- Re: PL support, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/05/12
- Re: PL support, Stefan Monnier, 2020/05/12
- Re: PL support, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/05/12
- Re: PL support, Stefan Kangas, 2020/05/12
- Re: PL support, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/12
- Re: PL support, 조성빈, 2020/05/13
- Re: PL support, tomas, 2020/05/13
- Re: PL support,
João Távora <=
- Re: PL support, Stefan Kangas, 2020/05/13
- Re: PL support, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/14
- Re: PL support, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/11
- Project.el, xref.el and eldoc.el in GNU ELPA (Was: PL support), João Távora, 2020/05/11
- Re: PL support, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/11
- Re: PL support, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/11
- Re: PL support, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/11
- Re: PL support, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/05/11
- Re: PL support, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/11
- Re: PL support, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/05/11