|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: Opaque objects and Emacs documentation |
Date: | Wed, 22 Jul 2020 19:26:42 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 |
On 22.07.2020 19:22, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Cc:acm@muc.de,rms@gnu.org,npostavs@gmail.com,emacs-devel@gnu.org From: Dmitry Gutov<dgutov@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:33:55 +0300 On 22.07.2020 17:31, Eli Zaretskii wrote:The alternative would be not writing said program at all.Technically, there's another alternative: implement said programs via different design patterns. But that's a separate discussion.How about we avoid unsubstantiated statements here?Which ones?
Your message above basically said that my statement was invalid. Without any supporting arguments. And you even cut it out of context.
Please stop that.And as for a "separate discussion", I already invited you to have it (to try to actually prove your opinion there), and you bowed out.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |