emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gnus-group-read-ephemeral-search-group -- Something Changed?


From: T.V Raman
Subject: Re: gnus-group-read-ephemeral-search-group -- Something Changed?
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:51:48 -0800

you're correct. But please keep the backward compatibility, since I
need emacspeak to work with both the released emacs 27, as well as
emacs-28 built from head which I use --- that latter is what helps me
make sure that when Emacs-28 does get released, emacspeak works out of
the box with it.Eric Abrahamsen writes:
 > "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com> writes:
 > 
 > > I use gnus-group-read-ephemeral-search-group to search GMail via imap,
 > > see details in this blog article:
 > > https://emacspeak.blogspot.com/2020/09/searching-gmail-from-gnus.html
 > >
 > > About  8 weeks or so, that function
 > > gnus-group-read-ephemeral-search-group was declared obsolete but its
 > > replacement was supposed to be backward compatible and everything
 > > worked until about 2 days ago --- or from memory I updated/rebuilt
 > > emacs yesterday and it's broken today.
 > >
 > > Broken: How,
 > >
 > > Now, when I invoke the afore-mentioned function
 > > I get an additional prompt after supplying the query  and calling it
 > > with the imap-search spec it expects. A quick look in git logs didn't
 > > show anything suspicious, other than the file was changed with
 > > comments to the effect that that function is obsolete.
 > 
 > Yes, this function has changed in the past couple of days, as nnir.el
 > has been obsoleted. I'm guessing you're calling
 > `gnus-gorup-read-ephemeral-search-group' with a spec that contains an
 > `nnir-search-spec' key? That key is now called `gnus-search-spec'.
 > 
 > I can provide better backwards compatibility by continuing to check for
 > the `nnir-search-spec' and `nnir-group-spec' keys, I guess I didn't
 > think people would be using that function programmatically in this way.
 > 
 > Would you be willing to show me exactly how you're calling this
 > function? I can be more certain about providing backwards compatibility
 > that way, and might be able to suggest some alterations.
 > 
 > Sorry for the roadbump,
 > 
 > Eric

-- 
♉Id: kg:/m/0285kf1  🦮♉

--
♉Id: kg:/m/0285kf1  🦮♉



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]