[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new coding system (was: Re: prettify symbols question)
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: new coding system (was: Re: prettify symbols question) |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Nov 2020 12:11:18 -0500 |
> So I've created a LISPM charmap, and a LISPM charset map based on
> that. Then calling define-charset and define-coding-system, if I now
> try to open a Lisp machine file in the lispm coding it seems to be
> unable to handle the various characters; e.g., #o210.
>
> These default coding systems were tried to encode text
> in the buffer âlispm-char-test.textâ:
> (lispm-unix (1 . 0) (59 . 1) (117 . 2) (175 . 3) (233 . 4) (291 . 5)
> (349 . 6) (407 . 7) (465 . 4194184) (523 . 4194185) (581 . 4194186))
> However, each of them encountered characters it couldnât encode:
> ....
What does "M-x describe-character-set RET lispm RET" show?
It says:
Character set: lispm
LISPM
Number of contained characters: 256
Map file: LISPM
Code space: [0 255]
And what was shown where you show the ellipsis?
These default coding systems were tried to encode text
in the buffer `lispm-char-test.text':
(lispm-unix (1 . 0) (59 . 1) (117 . 2) (175 . 3) (233 . 4) (291 . 5)
(349 . 6) (407 . 7) (465 . 4194184) (523 . 4194185) (581 . 4194186))
However, each of them encountered characters it couldn't encode:
lispm-unix cannot encode these: ^@ ^A ^B ^C ^D ^E ^F ^G \210 \211 ...
(where ^@ etc are #o0, #o1, etc and #o210 ...)
- RE: prettify symbols question, (continued)
- RE: prettify symbols question, Drew Adams, 2020/11/12
- Re: prettify symbols question, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/13
- Re: prettify symbols question, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/13
- Re: prettify symbols question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/11/13
- Re: prettify symbols question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/11/13
- Re: prettify symbols question, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/13
- Re: prettify symbols question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/11/13
- Re: prettify symbols question, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/13
- new coding system (was: Re: prettify symbols question), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/11/13
- Re: new coding system (was: Re: prettify symbols question), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/13
- Re: new coding system (was: Re: prettify symbols question),
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: new coding system (was: Re: prettify symbols question), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/14
- Re: new coding system (was: Re: prettify symbols question), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/11/14
- Re: new coding system (was: Re: prettify symbols question), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/14
- Re: new coding system (was: Re: prettify symbols question), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/11/23
- Re: new coding system (was: Re: prettify symbols question), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/23
- Re: new coding system (was: Re: prettify symbols question), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/11/28
- Re: new coding system (was: Re: prettify symbols question), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/11/13
- Re: new coding system, Andreas Schwab, 2020/11/13
- Re: new coding system, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/11/13
- Re: prettify symbols question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/11/13