Re: emacs for pure Gtk3

[황병희]

Tim Cross <theophilusx@gmail.com> writes:

>  ...
>  Make a screenshot.
>
> Sorry, only just saw this and I've already switched back to my 'normal' setup 
> (based on emacs 27.1). 
>
> I did find a couple of minor 'quirks', but don't know if they might not have 
> just been minor issues in current head
> anyway. 
>
> I did have to start the pgtk image with --no-x-resources switch to prevent it 
> from segfaulting. 
>
> It doesn't look a lot different than normal Emacs. Those with more of an eye 
> for the subtle aesthetics might notice
> more. I did notice that the fonts sizes were larger i.e. same font 
> specification gave slightly larger fonts. Also
> noticed that on a couple of occasions, initial layout for something complex 
> was a bit 'jumpy'. For example, I tried
> running spacemacs (which worked quite well) and the initial spash screen was 
> all out of alignment initially (at the
> end of loading it re-aligned and was fine). 
>
> So, probably not quite ready for day to day use, but still pretty good and 
> likely to be a real bonus for those running
> under Wayland who would like to get rid of the X layer completely. Emacs was 
> one of the 2 reasons I stopped
> running Wauyland and switched back to X - the other being I was also running 
> stumpwm (part of a little
> experiment I was doing where I was trying to make as much of my environment  
> on tools based on a
> lisp/functional approach as possible (stumpwm, emacs, nyxt, rep, guile, 
> clojure, clojurescirpt etc). 
>
> Tim

Switching from X11 to Wayland for perfactly is my final goal in GNU
Emacs. Thanks for testing Tim^^^ Indeed...

Sincerely, Wayland fan Byung-Hee

-- 
^고맙습니다 _地平天成_ 감사합니다_^))//