[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: elpa.git and `new-master`
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: elpa.git and `new-master` |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Dec 2020 10:59:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
On Dez 16 2020, Jean Louis wrote:
> Master as noun fits well:
For the repository, yes, but not for branches. Each has unique
contents, so they are not copies of each other.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, (continued)
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Stephen Leake, 2020/12/15
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Jonas Bernoulli, 2020/12/15
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Boruch Baum, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Pankaj Jangid, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Jean Louis, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Joost Kremers, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Jean Louis, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Stefan Monnier, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Stephen Leake, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Tim Landscheidt, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Richard Stallman, 2020/12/17
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Joost Kremers, 2020/12/17