Re: Patch upstream Git for Elisp diff hunk headings

[Basil L. Contovounesios]

Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:

> Adam Spiers <emacs-devel@adamspiers.org> writes:
>
>> While of course no one is claiming that this is technically correct in
>> all cases, I don't think I can actually recall ever seeing a single
>> instance of a top-level form which *was* indented.  So presumably it's
>> a good enough heuristic to be helpful in the vast majority of cases.
>> Or at least it's more likely to be right than a heuristic which
>> assumes that all top-level forms include "def" in the first symbol in
>> the form, since the latter obviously fails in many common scenarios
>> including the init files one mentioned above.
>
> (It also fails with `ert-deftest', and probably also other unit test
> frameworks in popular use.)

The current regexp doesn't fail on ert-deftest.

-- 
Basil