Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 13.02.2021 23:05, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> Backwards compatibility is certainly nice, but I don't think it's a
> priority when doing Emacs Lisp language design.

*shrug* I don't see a lot of downsides to doing it the backward 
compatible way here, and some forward-looking package maintainers could 
help promote the new feature.

If it's not backward-compatible at all, however, I wouldn't feel 
comfortable with using it in my packages for years to come.