Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> I'm still worried about the incompatibility we are introducing into
> byte code, and so were a couple of others.  You dismissed those
> concerns, and I frankly don't understand how they can be dismissed.
>
> To me, the proposed alternatives sound like a clear win, since the
> downsides are non-existent, whereas the advantage is clear.  Why do we
> need to insist on introducing bytecode incompatibility?

Nobody responded to my dismissals, so I have no idea what parts (if any)
of those people thought were insufficient.

Could you explain, perhaps?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no