Re: master 9291e73 02/12: Add new 'declare' forms for command completion predicates

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

"Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@tcd.ie> writes:

>> But you can say
>>
>> (declare (completion (lambda (...) ...)))
>
> Which my patch will turn into (function (lambda (...) ...)), which is
> still correct and should be equivalent.

Sure, but it's a bit redundant.

>> So it's a list of functions, not a list of symbols...
>
> What is a list?  The completion-predicate property takes on a single
> value satisfying functionp.

Sorry, I meant a single function.

What I expect to see people actually doing here is

  (declare (completion #'foo))

or if it's a lambda, that Emacs will eventually byte-compile it before
sticking it into the plist.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no